Power Plant Forum  
Go Back   Power Plant Forum > Steam Generators > Heat Recovery Steam Generators

Heat Recovery Steam Generators Forum for discussion on Heat Recovery Steam Generators regarding maintenance, operation, improvements, and more. This forum is open to any make and model Heat Recovery Steam Generators

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 05-29-2008
PPF Member
Power Rookie
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 11
Rep Power: 36
kidillusion is on a distinguished road
Default efficiency of converting the heat energy

What is the efficiency of converting the heat energy generated by a power plant due to combustion/fusion to electric energy?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 07-08-2008
PPF Member
New Person
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 33
borsch is on a distinguished road
Default RE: efficiency of converting the heat energy

This greatly depends on the design and mechanical characteristics of combustion (exhaust temperature, etc.) and steam turbines (reheat/non-reheat), and, especially, HRSGs (duct firing, single-or multi pressure, economizer, etc.).
It also depends on the type of fuel.
For example, CC plants based on H-series GE GTs can achieve up to 60% thermal efficiency (LHV) burning natural gas. Integrated Gasification CC plants (burning syngas), built on the same units, are at around 45-49%.

Alexei
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 07-08-2008
PPF Member
New Person
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 33
borsch is on a distinguished road
Default RE: efficiency of converting the heat energy

On the other hand, conventional GT-based plants (simple cycle) are, obviously much lower than combined cycle, and are generally under 50% (top performers being around 40-45%).

Fossil-fired boiler plants are also around 30-40% thermal efficiency. This again, is affected by the type of fuel (coal (anthracytes, lignites, etc.), oil fuel, natural gas or multi-fuel.

Again, there are ways to improve your thermal efficiency by various means (GT inlet air cooling, use of reheat steam turbines, coal pulverization, use of CFB boilers, etc.), but general figures are typically as I specified above.

Hope, that helps.

Alexei
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 12-20-2008
PPF Member
New Person
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 32
Jester is on a distinguished road
Default RE: efficiency of converting the heat energy

We are running a Siemens CC with 2 GTs Siemens SGT5-4000F /2 x HRSG/ 1 x ST and have an official rating of 56,87% which in reality is about 56% producing approx. 809MW max.

All the best

Jester
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 10-11-2009
PPF Member
Power Rookie
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Missouri
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 24
buntin is on a distinguished road
Default efficiency converting

Combined cycle - typically 7000 - 7500 BTU/Kwh

Conventional Steam - 9800 - 10,500 BTU/Kwh

Coal is still the cheaper MW because of the fuel cost per BTU. Typically <$15 per MW.

Conventional Natural Gas Plants would have to see <$1.50 per MCF (million cubic ft.) to truly compete with Coal.

A combined cycle plant can compete with coal power. $2.00 per MCF Natural Gas puts a Combined cycle plant at $15 - $17 per mw.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Discussion Replies Last Post
heat exchanger efficiency kidillusion Steam Powered Turbines 3 06-06-2008 10:04 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:16 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0